Yesterday we learned the change of particles from “o” to “ga”. When making short potential expression from a transitive verb predicate sentence, a sentence changes as shown below;
– Watashi wa Gita’a o Hikimasu. (I play a guitar.) — Transitive verb predicate sentence
=> Watashi wa Gita’a ga Hikemasu. (I can play a guitar.) — Potential Expression
It is one of the most important things that the particle “-o” marks an object of a transitive verb. But once the transitive verb conjugated to be potential form, then the sentence describes not action, but state about potentiality. In order to specify what is possible, the particle “-ga” is used. “-ga” is basically the subject maker when the sentence is to specifies what the subject is. Such a nature of “-ga”, specifying something, can also be applied to an object? Or, do we think that “-ga” is still specifying a subject? These two questions conflicting with each other also in today’s sentences.
1. Mado kara Fuji-san ga Miemasu.
(I can see Mountain Fuji through the window. / The view of Mountain Fuji comes into my eyes.)
2. Tonari no Heya kara Piano no Oto ga Kikoemasu.
(I can hear sound of piano from the next room. / From the next room, the sound of piano comes into my ears.)
I think you can find there are two English translations for one Japanese sentence.
The first translation is based on an interpretation (1) that the sentence came from transitive verb sentence and it turned to be potential expression. The second translation is based on different interpretation that the word with “ga” is the subject, and the verb is intransitive verb.
(1) Interpretation (1)
Let’s examine through the sentence1.
Although the potential form of “Mimasu” is “Miraremasu(*)”, some people regard “Miemasu” as the potential form of “Mimasu”. Those people think the sentence (1) is a kind of transitive verb sentence that comes from;
1-0 Watashi wa Mado kara Fuji-san o Mimasu. (I see Mt.Fuji through the window.)
In this 1-0, the subject is “Watashi”, and the verb “Mimasu” is a transitive verb. Making 1-0 a potential expression, you will get the sentence
1-1 Watashi wa Mado kara Fuji-san ga Miemasu. (I can see Mt.Fuji through the window.)
There are learners who are happy with 1-1 because 1-1 is a Wa-ga construction, and the particle “-o” doesn’t appear in the sentence. Therefore, this interpretation (1) has a negative effect that weakens the tie between the transitive verb and the object marker “-o”.
(2) Interpretation (2)
It’s true that “Miemasu” has a meaning of potentiality like below;
3. Neko wa Yoru demo Me ga Miemasu. (Cat’s eyes can see even in the night.)
But the interpretation (2) is a quite different approach.
1. Mado kara Fuji-san ga Miemasu. (The view of Mountain Fuji comes into my eyes.)
The subject is “Fuji-san” that is marked by “-ga”. The verb “Miemasu” is NOT a transitive verb, BUT an intransitive verb as well as the English verb “come” is an intransitive verb. And “Miemasu” is one of spontaneous verbs. A spontaneous verb describes a state in which something automatically comes into your recognition without your much intention to get it. In the case of the sentence 1, the view of Mountain Fuji comes into your eyes and you recognize the view.
The above argument is about the sentence 1. Let’s look at the sentence 2.
2. Tonari no Heya kara Piano no Oto ga Kikoemasu.
(From the next room, the sound of piano comes into my ears.)
Likewise, “Kikoemasu” is NOT the potential form of the transitive verb “Kikimasu (hear/listen to)”. The potential form is “Kikemasu”. “Kikoemasu” is also one of spontaneous verbs, which means a sound or voice comes into your ears.
The conclusion is that Interpretation (1) is semantically valid but grammatically incorrect. The correct one is the (2). However, there is a belief about (1) between some people. The very basics of Japanese language are “-ga” for a subject and “-o” for an object. Sometimes it seems there are exceptions, but things need to be understood on the firm foundation of basics.
As to spontaneous verbs, learning “Mieru/Miemasu” and “Kikoeru/Kikoemasu” is enough at this stage of Japanese learning. Here are some examples.
4. Asoko ni Shingou ga Miemasu. (See, there is a traffic light. / A view of traffic light is coming into your eyes.)
5. Kokuban no Ji ga Yoku Miemasen. (I can’t see the letters on blackboard well. / The letters on blackboard doesn’t come into my eyes clearly.)
6. Tori no Koe ga Kikoemasu. (I can hear voices of birds. / Birds’ voices come into my ears.)
7. Terebi no Oto ga Kikoemasen. (I can’t hear the sound of TV. / The sound of TV doesn’t come into my ears well.)
(*) For young people, the potential form of “Miru/Mimasu” is “Mireru/Miremasu”. Getting rid of “ra” from potential forms of Group2 verbs are quite common these days.
————————————–
This post was written with reference to the exercise A3 on Section27 of “Minna no Nihongo (2nd Edition)” published by “3A Corporation”