Japanese Learning (A5 S41): One who is Superior did me a Favor; [Person of Higher status] ga (Watashi ni) [V-te] Kudasai mashita.

Sentences in A4 and A5 have the same meanings in the section 41 in Minna no Nihongo. This is because those sentences need to be understood through comparisons between the sentence constructions for “Itadaku” and “Kudasaru”. Therefore, let us also compare the sentence constructions;

(1) Sentence using “Itadaku/Itadakimasu”

1) Watashi wa Sensei ni Kenkyuu-Shitsu no Naka o Misete Itadaki mashita.

(I was shown by the teacher the inside of the research room.)

(2) Sentence using “Kudasaru/Kudasaimasu”

2) Sensei ga Watashi ni Kenkyuu-Shitsu no Naka o Misete Kudasai mashita.

(The teacher showed me the inside of the research room.)

The meanings of the sentences 1) and 2) are the same. “Sensei” is the giver and “Watashi” is the receiver of the action that is showing the inside of research room. This difference of the subjects comes from whether the verb for honorific expression is an honorific or a humble language.

In the sentence 1), “Itadaku/Itadakimasu” is a humble language related to “Morau/Moraimasu”. Since “Watashi” is the person to be humble”, the subject of the sentence 1) is “Watashi”. In the sentence 2), “Kudasaru/Kudasaimasu” is an honorific related to “Kureru/Kuremasu”. Since “Sensei” is the person to be honored, the subject of the sentene 2) is “Sensei”.

The particle “-ni” in the sentences 1) and 2) have different functions. In the sentence 1), “-ni” of “Sensei ni” functions to indicate the source of the action in a sentence of giving/receiving. In the sentence 2), “-ni” of “Watashi ni” functions to indicate the target of an action’s effect. This “Watashi ni” is omitted in the exercise A5 of the section 41 in Minna no Nihongo. The reason of omitting would be avoiding confusions about particles for “Watashi” as you can see in the following 2’ and 3’.

 Yesterday’s sentences 2 and 3 with “Itadaki mashita” can be revised to use “Kudasai mashita” as follows;

2’. Sensei ga Watashi o Gakkai ni Tsurete itte Kudasai mashita.

(The teacher took me to the academic conference.)

You may find that it is not “Watashi ni” but “Watashi o” in this sentence 2’. Think that particles in the core verb phrase are maintained. The core verb phrase is;

– Watashi o Gakkai ni Tsurete iku (To take me to an academic conference)

Substituting this phrase into “Sensei ga — Kudasai mashita.” then we get the sentence 2’.

3’. Sensei ga Watashi no Supi’ichi Contesuto no Genkou o Naoshite Kudasai mashita.

(The teacher corrected my draft for speech contest.)

Again, the particle attached to “Watashi” is not “-ni”. This time it’s “Watashi no”. The core verb phrase is “Watashi no Supi’ichi Contesuto no Genkou o Naosu”. So, “Watashi no” is maintained in the sentence 3’.

As you see in the sentences 2’ and 3’, it is difficult for the learners to choose a particle after “Watashi” properly. It is safe to say it is a wise decision of writers of Minna no Nihongo to omit “Watashi” in the sentences of “Kudasai mashita”. Let me show you sentences of today, omitting “Watashi”.

1. Sensei ga Kenkyuu-Shitsu no Naka o Misete Kudasai mashita.

(The teacher showed me the inside of the research room.)

2. Sensei ga Gakkai ni Tsurete itte Kudasai mashita.

(The teacher took me to the academic conference.)

3. Sensei ga Supi’ichi Contesuto no Genkou o Naoshite Kudasai mashita.

(The teacher corrected my draft for speech contest.)

Today, we have learned the verb “Kudasaru/Kudasaimasu”. This verb needs attention about its euphonic change. Think about a two-verb sentence like below;

– Gohan o Tsukutte, Tabe mashita. (I cooked my supper, and ate it.)

This is a sentence of the beginner’s level. In the intermediate level, there is a little different sentence for the same meaning.

 – Gohan o Tsukuri, Tabe mashita. (I cooked my supper and ate it.)

I usually call “Tsukuri” as “Masu-form without ‘masu’”. But as for “Kudasaru/Kudasaimasu”, “Masu-form without ‘masu’” doesn’t work well. When there is a sentence with a “-te/de,” connection;

– Sensei ga Genkou o Naoshite Kudasatte, Watashi wa Contesuto de Yuushou Shi masita.

(The teacher corrected my draft, and I got the first prize in the contest.)

I am not sure whether or not teacher’s help constitutes misconduct, but anyway, you cannot change Te-form “Kudasatte” to be “Masu-form without ‘masu’” in this sentence.

(WRONG) Sensei ga Genkou o Naoshite <Kudasai>, Watashi wa Contesuto de Yuushou Shi masita.

(RIGHT) Sensei ga Genkou o Naoshite <Kudasari>, Watashi wa Contesuto de Yuushou Shi masita.

The verb “Kudasaru/Kudasaimasu” is of Group1-R.

– Nai-form : Kudasa<ra>nai

– Masu-form : Kudasa<ri>masu => Kudasa(i)masu (euphonic change)

– Dictionary form : Kudasa<ru>

– Conditional form : Kudasa<re>ba

– Volitional form : Kudasa<ro>u

Since we can see <ra,ri,ru,re,ro> in the conjugation pattern, “Kudasaru/Kudasaimasu” is a verb of Group1-R. But for its masu-form, it is usually “Kudasaimasu”. It is still okay to say “Kudasarimasu”, but it sounds a little old-fashioned. And as the example above shows, “Sensei ga Genkou o Naoshite <Kudasai>, Watashi wa —” is completely wrong. It should be <Kudasari> as the “Masu-form without ‘masu’” of the original Group1-R verb.

There are some Group1-R verbs whose Masu-form is mostly “-imasu” rather than “-rimasu”

– Kudasaru/Kudasaimasu (honorific of “give”)

– Irassharu/Irasshaimasu (honorific of “be there”)

– Ossharu/Osshaimasu (honorific of “say”)

– Nasaru/Nasaimasu (honorific of “do”)

————————————–

This post was written with reference to the exercise A5 on Section41 of “Minna no Nihongo (2nd Edition)” published by “3A Corporation”

Japanese Learning (A4 S41): One who is Superior did me a Favor. I Received His/Her Act; Watashi wa [Person of Higher status] ni [V-te] Itadaki mashita.

The main focus of the section 41 is to change some giving/receiving sentences to be more polite, or to be used when the receiver is a lower status person.

A1: Making it honorific : Morai mashita => Itadaki mashita

A2: Making it honorific : Kure mashita => Kudasai mashita

A3: The receiver is Lower status : Age mashita => Yari mashita

Actually, some textbook writes have a belief that teaching everything is important. Such textbook writers would add “Age mashita => Sashiage mashita”. But I don’t think teaching everything is good, because it increases learners’ burden to study. I think that teaching items are to be limited so that more basic and more frequently used items would be prioritized in second language learning. Anyway, A1 through A3 introduce the sentences of giving/receiving of an object that is a noun.  

A1: [Noun] o Itadaki mashita

A2: [Noun] o Kudasai mashita

A3: [Noun] o Yari mashita

In A4 through A6, the sentences describing someone did a beneficial action to someone in the following forms;

A4: [V-te] Itadaki mashita

A5: [V-te] Kudasai mashita

A6: [V-te] Yari mashita

[V-te] means a verb in Te-form. But it is not just a verb in Te-form only, it includes words consisting a verb clause like “No’oto o Misete (to show his/her notebook)”.

Now the sentence construction of A4 is as shown below;

(1) Watashi wa [Person Superior] ni [V-te] Itadaki mashita.

If who did you a favor is not a person superior to you, the sentence would have been;

(2) Watashi wa [Person] ni [V-te] Morai mashita.

(2) is a polite sentence of “Desu-Masu style”, and (1) is a honorific with more politeness than (2). Take a look at examples below;

1. Watashi wa Sensei ni Kenkyuu-Shitsu no Naka o Misete Itadaki mashita.

(I was shown by the teacher the inside of the research room.)

2. Watashi wa Sensei ni Gakkai e Tsurete itte Itadaki mashita.

(I was taken by the teacher to the academic conference.)

3. Watashi wa Sensei ni Supi’ichi Contesuto no Genkou o Naoshite Itadaki mashita.

(I was given by my teacher corrections on my draft for speech contest.)

————————————–

This post was written with reference to the exercise A4 on Section41 of “Minna no Nihongo (2nd Edition)” published by “3A Corporation”

Japanese Learning (A3 S41): Giving Sth to Someone of Lower Status; Watashi wa [Person of lower status] ni [Object] Yari mashita.

The main focus of the section 41 is to make sentences of giving/receiving from the perspective of the treatment expression. Most of the exercises A in this section are about honorific expressions in which actions are done by persons superior to “Watashi”. But in the exercise 3 and 6, sentences deal with persons inferior to “Watashi”. To be exact, those persons of lower status are not an action maker but action receiver, in other words, “Watashi” gives and a person of lower status receives.

And the verb used in the exercise A3 is “Yaru/Yarimasu”. Conjugation pattern is Group1-R.

– Nai-form : Ya<ra>nai

– Masu-form : Ya<ri>masu

– Dictionary form : Ya<ru>

– Conditional form : Ya<re>ba

– Intention form : Ya<ro>u

We can see <ra, ri, ru, re, ro>, therefore “Yaru/Yarimasu” is a verb of Group1-R. As for other conjugation forms; Te-form is Yatte, Ta-form is Yatta, passive form is Yarareru and Potential form is Yareru. If it were Group2, the passive and potential forms would be identical, but it’s not Group2 but Group1-R. So the passive form with “ra”, but the potential form lacks “ra”.

The verb “Yaru/Yarimasu” is sometimes used as a little rough alternative of “Suru/Shimasu”

– Shukudai o Shimasu. (I am going to do homework)

– Shukudai o Yarimasu. (ditto, but used in casual conversation)

But “Yaru/Yarimasu” in today’s sentence construction works as one of giving/receiving verbs. Sometimes the word “Yari-Morai Hyougen” is used in Japanese learning, which means “Giving/Receiving Expression”. “Yari” of “Yari-Morai” came from the verb “Yaru/Yarimasu”. And “Yaru/Yarimasu” is a verb for giving, not receiving, in the case that “Watashi” gives something to someone of lower status than “Watashi”. The example sentences are as follows:

1. Watashi wa Mago ni Okodzukai o Yari mashita. (I gave spending money to my granddaughther/grandsun.)

2. Watashi wa Niwa no Ki ni Mizu o Yari mashita. (I gave water to trees in my garden.)

3. Watashi wa Inu ni Esa o Yari mashita. (I gave my dog a food.)

Note that “Mago(granddaughter/sun)”, “Niwa no Ki(trees in garden)”, and “Inu(dog)” are of lower status than “Watashi”. But, for example, those who love dogs very much would want to treat their dog as a family member. They say not like the sentence 3, but as follows;

3’. Watashi wa Inu ni Gohan o Age masu. (I gave my dog a food.)

————————————–

This post was written with reference to the exercise A3 on Section41 of “Minna no Nihongo (2nd Edition)” published by “3A Corporation”

Japanese learning (A2 S41): Making a More Polite Expression in case that Someone Gave you Sth (Kure mashita); [Superior Person] ga Watashi ni [Object] o Kudasai mashita.

Yesterday we learned how to make “morai mashita” a more polite expression. That was a humble language “Itadaki mashita”. “Morai mashita” and “Itadaki mashita” are both verbs that are used in so-called “giving/receiving sentences”. Today too, we are learning an honorific expression of “giving/receiving sentences”. But there are several differences;

– Yesterday’s “Morai mashita” and “Itadaki mashita” are verbs of receiving.

– Today’s “Kure mashita” and “Kudasai mashita” are verbs of giving.

– Yesterday’s “Itadaki mashita” is a humble language.

– Today’s “Kudasai mashita” is an honorific.

First, check the level of politeness about a receiving verb “kureru/kuremasu” in past/perfect tense.

– Casual Language : Kureta.

– Polite Language : Kure mashita.

– Honorific of the level of Honolific Expression : Kudasai mashita.

People who speak Japanese always have to choose the proper level of politeness. When you talk to an intimate friend, you use “Kureta”, but think the chance to use “Kureta” is not often. When you talk to someone in the public space, it would be better to use “Kuremashita”. But if the person who gave you something is superior to you, “Kuremashita” is not enough polite. Then you need to use “Kudasai mashita” for the action of giving that the superior person did.

Again, “Kudasaru” is giving, while “Itadaku” is receiving. Take a look at the followings for sake of comparison;

(1) Humble language “Itadaku/Itadakimasu”

Watashi wa* [Superior Person] ni [Object] o Itadaki mashita.

Example : Watashi wa Sensei ni Hon o Itadaki mashita. (I received a book from my teacher.)

(2) Honorific “Kudasaru/Kudasaimasu”

[Superior Person] ga* Watashi ni [Object] o Kudasai mashita.

Example : Sensei ga Watashi ni Hon o Kudasai mashita. (My teacher gave me a book.)

When using a honorific in the sentence, the subject must be a superior person to you, because honorifics are words to pay respect to action that the superior person did.

Now, here are example sentences;

1. Shachou ga Watashi ni Ryuugaku no Kikai o Kudasai mashita.

(The company president gave me an opportunity to study abroad.)

– Shachou : noun : a company president

– Ryuugaku : noun (that can be Group3 verb “[Noun]+suru”) : Studying abroad

– Kikai : noun : an opportunity

2. Tonari no Ojiisan ga Watashi ni Niwa no Kaki o Kudasai mashita.

(The old man next door gave me persimmons of his tree.)

When making an old people the subject in your Japanese sentence, it is better to use honorific for his/her action.

And the same caution again as yesterday,

(WRONG) Haha ga Watashi ni Okane o Kudasai mashita.

(RIGHT) Haha ga Watashi ni Okane o Kure mashita.

Your mother is superior to you, of course, but you cannot use honorifics to your mother’s action when you are talking to people who are not a family member of yours. Calling your mom “Oka’asan” is also wrong in this situation.

* : The reason that the subject marker in the sentence (1) is “-wa” but that of sentence (2) is “-ga”

In the case of (1), “Watashi” is talking in front of the listener. The listener knows who the “Watashi” is. When what the subject has already been shared between the speaker and the listener, “-wa” is used for subject marker.

In the case of (2), the listener has not known who the subject is just before the utterance. When who the subject is is a new information to the listener, “-ga” is used for subject marker.

————————————–

This post was written with reference to the exercise A2 on Section41 of “Minna no Nihongo (2nd Edition)” published by “3A Corporation”

Japanese learning (A1 S41): Making a More Polite Expression in case of Receiving (Morai mashita); Watashi wa [Superior Person] ni [Object] o Itadaki mashita.

The main purpose of the section 41 is to learn how to make honorific expressions for Giving/Receiving sentences. Honorific expressions are introduced in the section 49 and 50. But in this section 41, honorific expressions of giving/receiving sentences are introduced precedingly. It is probably because they are more likely to be used in conversations.

When it comes to honorific expressions, it is very important to distinguish between honorifics and humble language. Honorifics are introduced in the section 49, and Humble language in the section 50. Today we are learning one of humble language “Itadaki mashita”. Take a look at the followings that show increasing politeness;

– Casual Language : Moratta.

– Polite Language : Morai mashita.

– Humble Language of the level of Honolific Expression : Itadaki mashita.

Note that “Morai mashita” is a polite language that you can use in public spaces. But sometimes it is not enough polite when you speak to elderlies, your boss, teachers, your customers, a person you met at the first time, and so on. In such occasion, you would use humble language. And it is important to know, “Watashi (I)” must be the subject in a sentence of humble language, because “Watashi (I)” has to be humble.

 Today’s sentence construction is as follows;

– Watashi wa [Person] ni [Object] o Itadaki mashita.

where, [Person] is a superior person to you.

1. Watashi wa Sensei ni Hon o Itadaki mashita. (I received a book from my teacher.)

The sentence 1 is an honorific expression using humble language “Itadaki mashita”. “Sensei” can be replaced with other persons who is superior to you. But you need to be careful. When you are talking to people outside your family, you cannot put your family member to the “Sensei” part of the sentence 1.

(WRONG) Watashi wa Haha ni Okane o Itadaki mashita.

(RIGHT) Watashi wa Haha ni Okane o Morai mashita.

Your mother is superior to you, of course, but you cannot be humble to your mother in front of people who are not a family member of yours. In this case, calling your mom “Oka’asan” is also wrong.

————————————–

This post was written with reference to the exercise A1 on Section41 of “Minna no Nihongo (2nd Edition)” published by “3A Corporation”

Japanese learning (A3 S40): Doing Something on a Trial Basis ; [V-te] + mimasu.

We have already learned “[V-te]+iru”, “[V-te]+aru”, “[V-te]+oku”, and “[V-te]+shimau”. These verbs put behind a Te-form of a verb are mostly losing their original meaning and functioning to add meanings to the verb in Te-form. This time, we are learning “[V-te]+miru”.

“Miru/Mimasu” is a transitive verb which means to see, look at, and watch. It conjugates as a Group 2 verb. It is usually written with Kanji (見る) when it is used for the original meaning. But when used in the form of “[V-te]+miru”, it is often written only by Hiragana (みる). “[V-te]+miru” means to do something as a trial. It is like “Giving it a try”.

1. Sankousho o Mite mi masu. (I will try to check it on a reference book.)

It looks like the same verb is repeated, but two “Miru”(s) are different. The first “Mite” works as a verb with the original meaning. The second “Mimasu” is a supplementary verb to add meaning to the verb from behind.

2. Kono Fuku o Kite mite mo Iidesu ka. (May I try this outfit?)

Suppose this is uttered in front of the fitting room in a clothing store. “[V-te] mo Ii desuka” is an expression when asking a permission.

————————————–

This post was written with reference to the exercise A3 on Section40 of “Minna no Nihongo (2nd Edition)” published by “3A Corporation”

Japanese learning (A2 S40): Commenting on a Clause similar to “Whether or not”; { Subordinate Clause } + ka douka, { Main Clause }.

これも作成に時間がかかりそうです。

————————————–

This post was written with reference to the exercise A2 on Section40 of “Minna no Nihongo (2nd Edition)” published by “3A Corporation”

Japanese learning (A1 S40): Making a Comment about Wh-Question (2); { Question with Interrogative Word } + ka, { Verb Predicate about Wh-question }.

ちょっと今日も書けません。疑問詞と疑問文の中の述語の2つのパラメーターがありますから、例文を考えるのが大変です。後日に回そうと思います。

Japanese learning (A1 S40): Making a Comment about Wh-Question (1); Review on use of Interrogative Words and particles.

We are going to learn the following sentence construction in the exercise A1 of the section 40.

[Interrogative word Question], [Main Clause with Verb Predicate].

This is not just a simple question using interrogative word. Putting an interrogative word question on the subordinate clause, the sentence mentions something about that question. An example is as below;

1. Dare ga Satou-sensei ka, Wakari masen. (I don’t know who Sato-sensei is.)

In order to learn this sentence construction, knowing Interrogative word questions is a prerequisite. Therefore, this post is to review Interrogative word question in conjunction with particles that are put behind the interrogative words.

(1) Dare (Who)

1) Dare ga

“-ga” is the particle that indicates the subject.

2. Q : Dare ga Kabin o Kowashi mashita ka. (Who broke the flower vase?)

A : Suzuki-kun ga Kowashi mashita. (Suzuki-kun broke it.)

2) Dare o

“-o” is the particle that indicates an object of action by a transitive verb.

3. Q : Sensei wa Dare o Chu’ui shimashita ka. (Whom did the teacher scold?)

A : Sensei wa Takahasi-kun o Chu’ui shimashita. (Suzuki-kun broke it.)

Note that “-o Chu’ui suru” and “-ni Chu’ui suru” are different in meanings.

3) Dare ni

“-ni” is the particle that indicates destination where an action is heading toward. But sometimes “-ni” indicates who makes giving/receiving, passive, and causative actions. It is a little funny that “-ni” is usually a goal point but sometimes become start point of action.

4. Q : Dare ni Tegami o Okuri masu ka. (Whom do you send the letter?)

A : Satou-sa ni Okuri masu. (I send this to Sato-san.)

“-ni” in this sentence 4 indicates whom the action is heading to.

5. Q : Dare ni Shikarareta n desu ka. (Who were you scolded by?)

A : Kobayashi-sensei ni Shikarare mashita. (I was scolded by Kobayashi-sensei.)

“-ni” in this sentence 5 indicates who made the action of a passive voice.

(2) Nani/Nan (What)

1) Nani ga

“-ga” is the particle that indicates the subject. But sometimes it seems to indicate an object of desire, potential, emotion, and so on when a predicate is a stative word like adjectives.

6. Q : Satou-san wa Ima Nani ga ichiban Hoshii desu ka. (What do you want most right now?)

A : Watashi wa Koibito ga Hoshii desu. (I want a partner.)

“Hoshii” is an I-adjective that expresses one’s desire. An object of desire is usually indicated by “ga”. But don’t forget that an object of transitive verb is indicated by “-o” in the form of “[Subject] wa/ga [Object] o [Transitive Verb].”

2) Nani o

“-o” is the particle that indicates an object of action by a transitive verb.

7. Q : Nani o Tabe masu ka. (What do you eat?)

A : Tamago o Tabe masu. (I eat egg.)

3) Nani ni

“-ni” is the particle that indicates destination where an action is heading toward.

8. Q : Nani ni Kyoumi ga Ari masu ka. (What are you interested in?)

A : Jinkou-Chinou ni Kyouni ga Ari masu. (I am interested in AI.)

Someone may interpret this “-ni,” differently, but you can think “-ni” in the sentence 8 indicates where the interest is heading toward.

4) Nani de

“-de” is the particle that indicates what you use while you are making action such as tools and place.

9. Q : Nani de Kami o Kiri masu ka. (By what do you cut paper?)

A : Hasami de Kami o Kri masu. (I cut paper by scissors.)

You can also use “Nande” as shortened “Nani de”. But “Nande” is frequently used for the question of Why. Therefore, if you say “Nande Kami o Kiri masuka?”, the listener would think that your question is “Why are you going to cut that paper?”

(3) Doko/Dochira (Where)

1) Doko ga

10. Q : Nihon Ryokou nara, Doko ga Ii desu ka. (When it comes to travel in Japan, where is the good place?)

A : Kusatsu no Onsen ga Ii desu yo. (Kusatsu Onsen is a good place to go.)

2) Doko o

11. Q : Kippu o Kau Toki, Doko o Oshi masu ka. (When I buy a ticket, where do I need to push?)

A : Kono Botan o Oshi masu. (Push this button.)

Suppose they are in front of a ticket vending machine in a railway station. “Where” means “which button” on the machine.

3) Doko ni

12. Q : Doko ni Toire ga Ari masu ka. (Where is a washroom?)

A : Aosoko ni Toire ga Ari masu. (It’s over there.)

Suppose they are in front of a ticket vending machine in a railway station. “Where” means “which button” on the machine. By the way, “Where is a restroom?” is the most important sentence when you learning the second language. Any second language textbook must introduce “Where is a restroom” in the early part of the book. This is my belief. In the case of Japanese, the question 12Q is not a best sentence in this regard, every Japanese textbooks introduce “Toire wa Doko desuka.” This is also a good example to show that the particle “wa” needs to be introduced prior to “-ga” as the subject indicator.

4) Doko de

13. Q : Doko de Obentou ga Kae masu ka. (Where can I buy a lunchbox?)

A : Aono Omise de Obentou ga Kae masu. (You can buy a lunchbox in that shop.)

Having looked at the example 12 and 13, you may wonder how to choose “-ni” or “-de” for a place because “Asoko ni” and “Aono Omise de” are both indicating places. Follow the rules below;

– [Place] + ni : Place of existence

– [Place] + de : Place to make action

(4) Dou/Ikaga (How)

So far, the interrogative words “Dare, Nani, Doko” are a kind of Noun. But interrogative word “Dou” is not a noun but an adverb. Therefore, you don’t need a particle behind “Dou”. When it comes to adverbs, you need to pay attention what verb that adverb is related to. Let us check the uses of “Dou” with verbs “yaru(yatte)”, “suru(shimashita)”, and “suru(shimasu)”.

1) Dou yatte (How)

14. Q : Dou yatte Umi ni Iki masu ka. (How do you get to the sea?)

A : Niigata-eki kara Hamauracho-iki no Basu ni Notte iki masu. (I go there getting on a bus for Hamaura-cho at Niigata Station.)

The verb “yaru/yarimasu” is one of giving/receiving verbs with a little roughness. Also, it is used as a little rough alternative for the verb “suru/shimasu”. The example sentence 14 uses “yaru” for the latter meaning. “Yatte” is the Te-form of “yaru/yarimasu” which is a Group 1-R verb because its Nai-form is “Ya<ra>nai”. Te-form of Group1 verbs can be obtained by “I/Chi/Ri=>tte, Bi/Mi/Ni=>nde, Ki=>ite, Gi=>ide, Shi=>shite, Ikimasu=>Itte”. Applying ““I/Chi/Ri=>tte,” to “Ya<ri>masu”, we can get “Yatte” as the Te-form. The important thing is that a verb in Te-form modifies another verb behind. A word modifying a verb is, by definition, an adverbial. Therefore, “Dou yatte” still works as an adverb.

2) Dou shimashitaka (What happened)

15. Q : Dou Shi mashita ka. (What happened to you?)

A : Kinou kara, Netsu ga Dete, Nodo mo Itaku Nari mashita. (I have got high temperature and throat ache since yesterday.)

The interrogative adverb “Dou” is related to the verb “suru/shimasu”.

3) Dou shimasuka (What are you going to do)

16. Q : Nichiyoubi ni Ame ga Futtara, Dou Shi masu ka. (If it rains on Sunday, what are you going to do?)

A : Ie ni Imasu. (I stay at home.)

The interrogative adverb “Dou” is related to the verb “suru/shimasu”.

An adverb and a noun are different. But some adverbs can be predicates of sentences with “desu” which ends up looking like a noun. For example,

– Yukkuri Hashiri masu. ((He/She) runs slowly.)

— the adverb “Yukkrui” modifies the verb “Hashirimasu”.

– Kame no Aruki Kata wa Yukkuri desu. (The way a turtle walks is slow.)

— The predicate “Yukkuri desu.” looks like a noun predicate.

“Dou” also can be a predicate with “desu” and “deshita”. Let’s check the expressions using “dou desuka” and “dou deshitaka”.

4) Dou desu ka (How about?)

17. Q : Satou-sensei no Jugyou wa Dou desu ka. (What do you think about Sato-sensei’s class?)

A : Totemo Ii to Omoi masu. (I think it’s very good.)

5) Dou deshita ka (What was it like?)

18. Q : Nihon Ryokou wa Dou deshita ka. (What was it like your travel in Japan?)

A : Totemo Yokatta desu. (It was very good.)

(5) Doushite/Naze/Nande (Why)

As well as “Dou”, these interrogative words are adverbs. Therefore, they are used without a particle their behind.

1) Doushite

19. Q : Doushite Kinou Jugyouni Konakattan desu ka. (Why you didn’t come to the class yesterday?)

A : Kaze o Hiita n desu. (Because I caught a cold.)

“Doushite” is introduced in the exercise A5 of the section 9 before “-nde/-node” is introduced. However, when asked “Doushite (Why)?” and answering to it, it is better to use an expression to say a reason for the answer. “-nde/-node” has a function to reveal something that sounds like “to tell you the truth”. And “-nde/-node” has also a function to add nuance of explanation. Therefore, “Kaze o Hiita ndesu.” sounds more explanatory than “Kaze o Hikimashita.”

2) Naze

20. Q : Naze Kusuri o Nomanai n desu ka. (Why you didn’t take a medicine?)

A : Totemo Takai kara desu. (Because it’s too expensive.)

The answer 20A also uses an expression to say a reason, which is “kara desu.” Answering questions with Doushite and Naze, it is good to use “-ndesu.” or “-karadesu.”

(6) Dochira (Which of the Two)

“Dochira” has already appeared in (3) as the polite version of “Doko (Where)”. But “Dochira” is also used as an interrogative word when asking to choose one out of two.

1) Dochira ga

21. Q : Kono Futatsu no Uchi, Dochira ga Ii desu ka. ((If I choose) one of these two, which is better?)

A : Hidari no ga Ii desu yo. (The one on the left is better.)

2) Dochira o

22. Q : Kuri’imu Ke’eki to Choko Ke’eki no Dochira o Tabe masu ka. (Which do you eat; cream cake or chocolate cake?)

A : Choko Ke’eki o Tabe masu. (I eat chocolate cake.)

3) Dochira ni

23. Q : Ko’ohi’i to Koucha, Dochira ni Shi masu ka. (Which do you drink; coffee or black tea?)

A : Watashi wa Ko’ohi’i ni Shi masu. (I would like to drink coffee.)

“-ni suru/-ni shimasu” expresses a result of selection, which is introduced in A5 of the section 44.

4) Dochira de

24. Q : Eki to Basutei no Dochira de Machi mashou ka. (Which place shall I wait for you; the station or the bus stop?)

A : Eki de Matte ite kudasai. (Please wait for me at the station.)

5) Dochira to

“-to” is the particle that indicates a counterpart who acts together with.

25. Q : Ashita Suzuki kun to Satou kun no Dochira to Dekake masu ka. (With whom are you going out tomorrow; Suzuki-kun or Sato-kun?)

A : Suzku kun to Dekake masu. (I am going out with Suzuki-kun.)

6) Dochira kara

“-kara” is the particle that indicates a starting point in terms of both time and space.

26. Q : Densha wa Ichi-bansen to Ni-bansen no Dochira kara Demasu ka. (Which platform the train starts; Number1 or 2?)

A : Ni-bansen kara De masu. (The train starts from the platform Number 2.)

7) Dochira mo

“-mo” is the particle that indicates a same kind and/or a parallel item.

27. Q : Hanauracho-iki no Basu to Shiananomachi-iki no Basu wa Dochira mo Umi ni Iki masu ka. (Are the both buses for Hamauracho and Shinanomachi going to the seaside?)

A : Iie, Shinanomachi-iki wa Umi ni Iki masen. (No, a bus for Shinanomachi doesn’t get close to the seaside.)

(7) Dore (Which one)

“Dore” is used when choosing one from three selections or more, while “Dochira” is used for two selections.

1) Dore ga

“-ga” is the particle that indicates a subject.

28. Q : Dore ga Satou-san no Kasa desu ka. (Which umbrella is the Sato-san’s?)

A (Sato) : Kore ga Watashi no Kasa desu. (This is my umbrella.)

2) Dore o

“-o” is the particle that indicates on object of action by a transitive verb, or places related to action of intransitive verb for moving. Since “dore” hardly means a place, if you find “dore o”, there would be a transitive verb behind.

29. Q : Ko’ohi’i to Koucha, Soshite Ryokucha ga Ari masu. Dore o Nomi masu ka. (We have coffee, black tea, and green tea. Which do you drink?)

A : Ko’ohi’i o Nomi masu. (I drink coffee.)

3) Dore ni

As in the case of “Dochira ni”, “Dore ni” is also used for a question which the listener will choose in the form of “Dore ni Shimasu ka”.

30. Q : Ko’ohi’i to Koucha, Soshite Ryokucha ga Ari masu. Dore ni Shi masu ka. (We have coffee, black tea, and green tea. Which do you choose?)

A : Ko’ohi’i ni Shi masu. (My choice is coffee.)

4) Dore de

31. Q : Juu-ji dai wa Juppu to sa-juppun, go-juppun ni Basu ga Ari masu. Dore de Iki masu ka. (There are buses on ten-hour; 10, 30, and 50. Which bus shall we get on?)

A : San-juppun no de Iki mashou. (Let’s get on the bus at 30 minutes.)

(8) Dono (Which)

“Dono” is an interrogative word which is adnominal. Adnominal is a name of word groups also known as “pre-noun adjectival”. There are words that exclusively modify nouns in Japanese (Rentai-shi). Let’s make a quick review about modifiers in Japanese. There are four groups of modifiers.

<1> Na-adjectives;

 They modify nouns with “na” like “Kirei-na-Keshiki”. Through conjugation, Na-adjectives can also modify verbs and adjectives like “Kirei-ni-Narimashita” and “Kirei-de Kaiteki desu.”

<2> I-adjectives;

 They modify nouns with “i” like “Atsu-i-Natsu”. Through conjugation, I-adjectives can also modify verbs and adjectives like “Atsu-ku-Narimashita.”

<3> Adnominals;

 They modify nouns only, never conjugate. One example is “O’okina”. “O’okina Ie” means “a big house”. Although you can see “na”, “O’okina” never conjugates like a Na-adjective because “(WRONG) O’okida”, “(WRONG)O’okini”, and “(WRONG)O’okide” are not existing.

<4> Adverbs;

They modify verbs and adjectives, don’t conjugate. There are several types and the explanation about adverbs can be lengthy. Let me skip it.

So far in this post, interrogative words work like nouns or adverbials in grammatical sense. But “Dono” is an interrogative word that works like adnominals which modify nouns and never conjugate.

1) Dono + Noun (Which+noun)

32. Q : Dono Hito ga Maria-san desu ka. (Which person is Ms.Maria?)

A : Kami ga Nagai Hito ga Maria-san desu. (The lady with long hair is Ms. Maria.)

Actually, Example sentence 4 of the section 16 in Minna no Nihongo, “Dono” is used in predicate part of the sentence. I have used it in subject part, that’s the difference.

(9) Don’na (What kind of)

“Don’na” is said to be a Na-adjective in the dictionary. Interestingly, “na” at the end is not the conjugating part but the stem. Since it seems to have some complexity to deal with “Don’na” as a Na-adjective, let me show an example in the form of “Don’na + Noun”.

1) Don’na + Noun

33. Q : Don’na Hito ga Suki desu ka. (What kind of a person do you like (for your partner)?)

A : Yasashii Hito ga Suki desu. (I like a kind person.)

(10) Ikutsu (How many)

“Ikutsu” is an interrogative word which is categorized to be a noun, but often works like an adverb. “Working like an adverb” means that the word is used without a particle behind. If it’s completely used as a noun, a particle follows behind the word like “Ikutsu ga Ii desuka. (How many is good for you?)”. The sentence 34 below is an example of use of “Ikutsu” as an adverb, and the 35 of a noun predicate.

1) Ikutsu for amount/number

34. Q : Mikan o Ikutsu Kaimashita ka. (How many mandarin oranges did you buy?)

A : Itsutsu Kai mashita. (I bought five of them.)

2) Ikutsu for Age

35. Q : O-toshi wa O-ikutsu desu ka. (How old are you?)

A : Toshi wa Nanajuu- Hachi desu. (I am 78 years old.)

Toshi is a noun for age, and the prefix “o-” adds politeness to a word.

<to be continued! >

いくら

なん(何)

————————————–

This post was written with reference to many parts of “Minna no Nihongo (2nd Edition)” published by “3A Corporation”

Japanese learning (A3 S39): Conjunctive Particle to Denote a Cause/Reason; { I-adj/Na-adj/Noun }+node, {Main Clause}.

“-node,” is a conjunctive particle to express a cause/reason about what is written in the main clause in the following format.

– [Clause of a cause/reason] + node, [Main Clause].

When it comes to the relationship between subordinate clause and main clause, “-node,” is one of conjunctive particles for the direct connection. Suppose that you have read the subordinate clause, and then you read the main clause. If what is written in the main clause is a predictable and/or an expected one from the subordinate clause, the connection between the two clauses is “direct (sequence) connection”.

In the last post, we learned how to use “-node,”. But those were sentences that had verb predicates in the subordinate clause only (Verb+node,). We are learning today sentences whose subordinate clauses have an I-adjective, a Na-adjective, or a Noun predicate.

– [I-adj]+node, / [Na-adj] + node, / [Noun]+na node,

1. Atama ga Itai node, Kaettemo Ii desuka.

(I have a headache, so may I go home?)

“Itai” is an I-adjective. An I-adjective conjugates like; Itai, Itakatta, Itakunai, Itakereba. But to continue to “-node,” it’s just “Itai”.

2. Ashita no Tenki ga Shimpaina node, Tenkiyohou o Nando mo Mimasu.

(Since I worry about tomorrow’s weather, I frequently check the forecast.)

“Shimpai” is a Na-adjective. Na-adjectives also conjugate, but to continue to “-node”, they also take a form to continue to a noun that is “[Na-adj]+na”.

3. Ashita wa Kimatsu-shiken na node, Komban Benkyou shinakereba narimasen.

(I take the final examinations tomorrow, so I need to study tonight.)

“Kimatsu-shiken” is a noun that means the final exams. I wrote in the last post about “-node” that the connection of the subordinate clause and “-node,” is;

[Short ending style] + node,

But, like this sentence 3, when the predicate of the subordinate clause is a noun, an exception happens.

<Wrong> Kimatsu-shiken da node, — [Short ending style] + node,

<Right> Kimatsu-shiken na node, — This looks similar to “[Na-adj] + na + node,”.

In addition, there are two issues; one is a comparison between “-kara,” and “-node,”. The other is a kind of broad issue about connection between subordinate clauses and conjunctive particles in terms of style.

(1) Comparison between “-kara,” and “-node,”.

Both “-kara,” and “-node,” are conjunctive particles whose function is to express cause/reason of what is written in the main clause. Then a question is what is the difference between the two.

1. Atama ga Itai node, Kaettemo Ii desuka.

(I have a headache, so may I go home?)

4. Atama ga Itai kara, Kaettemo Ii desuka.

If you have got a headache while in the class, and want to say to a Japanese teacher you would like to leave, I recommend you saying 1 not 4. Sometimes “-kara,” and “-node,” are explained as “-kara,” is subjective. while “-node,” is objective. The sentence 4 sounds like the speaker takes it for granted as to leaving the class room because of his/her personal matter.

(2) Speech style just in front of conjunctive particle.

We learned the conjunctive particle “-kara,” for cause/reason at the exercise A5 in the section 9, the example was like below. At that time, “short ending style” for a sentence ending had not been introduced yet. Therefore, an example sentence would have been like the one below;

5. Atama ga Itai desu kara, Ie ni Kaeri masu. (Because my head is aching, I am going home.)

Forget about “-kara,” is subjective, while “-node,” is objective. Anyway, if we use “-node,” we get;

6. Atama ga Itai node, Ie ni Kaeri masu. (ditto)

Putting aside of difference of kara and node, is there any difference between the sentences 5 and 6? Look at just in front of the conjunctive particles.

5’. Atama ga <Itai desu> kara, Ie ni Kaeri masu. — “Desu/masu Style”

6’. Atama ga <Itai> node, Ie ni Kaeri masu.  — “Da/Dearu Style”

The difference is the style of I-adjective predicates in front of conjunctive particles. Again, when “kara” was introduced, the short ending style (Da/Dearu) had not been introduced. Now the leaners know what the short ending style is like, the followings are also possible.

5’’. Atama ga <Itai> kara, Ie ni Kaeri masu. — “Da/Dearu Style”

Or, it is also okay to use the polite ending style (Desu/Masu) for “node”.

6’’. Atama ga <Itai desu> node, Ie ni Kaeri masu.  — “Desu/Masu Style”

At a glance of 5’ through to 6’’, you may think there is a freedom with speech style as to in front of conjunctive particles. But my recommendation is to use the short ending style in front of conjunctive particles for most of the cases.

When you speak Japanese to someone, all the sentence ending must be the polite ending style (Desu/Masu) unless you are talking to verry close friends or to people subordinate to you. Sometimes the polite ending style needs to be used even in the middle of a sentence. For example, in the case of the conjunctive particle “-ga,” it is better to use the polite ending style in front of “-ga,” to make it consistent to the sentence ending as shown below;

7. Shigoto wa Isogashii <desu> ga, Tanoshii desu.

(My Job is busy but enjoyable.)

In the case of “-kara”, both the short and polite ending styles are okay, but it is slightly better to use the polite one;

8. Nihongo ga Yome<masen>kara, Shimbun o Kaimasen.

(Since I cannot read Japanese, I don’t buy newspapers.)

But it is better to use the short ending style in front of conjunctive particles in most of the cases.

9. Ashita wa Hareru node, Yama ni Iki masu. (Since the weather will be fine tomorrow, I am going to a mountain.)

9 is better than “Ashita wa Haremasu node” in terms of conciseness.

10. Ame ga Futta ra, Dekake masen. (If it rains, I won’t go out.)

10 is better than “Ame ga Furimashita ra,” to avoid excessive politeness.

Not only {[short ending style]+[conjunctive particle]}, there are some patterns of connections to conjunctive particles, for example;

[Masu-form eliminating “masu”]+[conjunctive particle]

11. Rajio o Tsuke+nagara, Benkyou shimasu. (I study with a radio turning on.)

Mastering many conjunctive particles is an important part of Japanese learning.

————————————–

This post was written with reference to the exercise A3 on Section39 of “Minna no Nihongo (2nd Edition)” published by “3A Corporation”