カテゴリー: 日本語学習

Japanese learning (A6 S22): Application of “Verb Modified Noun” to a “ga” word of Wa-ga construction whose Predicate is “Aru/Arimasu”: [Topic] wa {[Verb Clause] + [Noun] }ga + Arimasu.

Yesterday, we learned how to apply a verb modified noun to “-ga” word in wa-ga construction sentences. Today, too, we are going to learn the same construction as below;

[Topic] wa {[Verb Clause] + [Noun]} ga [Predicate].

The difference from yesterday is that;

– Yesterday: the predicates are I- adjectives and Na-adjectives.

– Today: the predicates are intransitive verbs.

In both cases, the predicates are stative words. Wa-ga constructions that came from a transitive verb sentence and its object turned to be the topic (-wa) are not included today’s wa-ga constructions.

The following examples are shown with titles by the predicate verbs.

(1) Aru/Arimasu

Aru/Arimasu is an intransitive verb to describe something is existing.

1. Watashi wa Jikan ga Arimasen. (I don’t have time.)

Unless you say the time is for what you do, the sentence 1 doesn’t have enough information.

1’ Watashi wa Nohongo o Benkyousuru Jikan ga Arimasen. (I don’t have time to study Japanese.)

2. Watashi wa Youji ga Arimasu. (I have a thing to do.)

This sentence 2 is grammatically okay, but the listener would quickly ask you what kind of thing you need to do. It is better to include what you need to do in the sentence.

2’ Watashi wa Byouin ni Iku Youji ga Arimasu. (I need to go to a hospital.)

Although A6 S23 in Minnano Nihongo deals with “Aru/Arimasu” only, let us learn several wa-ga construction sentences using other verbs for predicates.

(2) Iru/Irimasu（要る／要ります)

Note that it’s not “Iru/Imasu(居る／居ます)” meaning an existence of human and animals. This is “Iru/Irimasu” meaning necessity. Japanese sentence “A wa B ga Irimasu.” can be usually translated into English as “A needs B” which is a transitive verb sentence. On the other, “A wa B ga Irimasu.” is an intransitive verb sentence. The particle “-ga” is used in order to specify what is needed.

3. Watashi wa Kutsu ga Irimasu. (I need (a pair of) shoes.)

There are several kinds of shoes depending on the purpose. Some modification needs to be added to the noun “Kutsu”.

3’. Watashi wa Undoujou de Haku Kutsu ga Irimasu. (I need a pair of shoes so that I can put on sports ground.)

(3) Wakaru/Wakarimasu

Wakaru/Wakarimasu means “understand/can tell”. Japanese sentence “A wa B ga Wakarimasu.” can be usually translated into English as “A understand B” or “A can tell B.”, which are transitive verb sentences. On the other, “A wa B ga Wakarimasu.” is an intransitive verb sentence. The particle “-ga” is used in order to specify what is understandable.

4. Watasi wa Nihongo ga Wakarimasen. (I don’t understand Japanese.)

This sentence 4 is grammatically okay, but is it real that the speaker understands nothing at all? At least this person said one Japanese sentence. These should be different level of understanding for each person. Some modification needs to be put in front of “Nohongo”.

4’ Watasi wa Satou-san ga Iu Nihongo ga Wakarimasen. (I don’t understand what Sato-san speaks to me in Japanese.)

Now, “Koto ga Dekimasu” expressing Possibility in A2 to 4 S18 and “Koto ga Arimasu” expressing experience in A2 S19 are also kinds of wa-ga constructions that are using verb clause to modify a noun. The noun for these is “Koto” which doesn’t have a concrete meaning but has the function to make a verb as a noun-equivalent.

This post was written with reference to the exercise A6 on Section22 of “Minna no Nihongo (2nd Edition)” published by “3A Corporation”

Japanese learning (A5 S22): Application of “Verb Modified Noun” to a “ga” word of Wa-ga construction whose Predicate is I/Na-adjectives: [Topic] wa {[Verb Clause] + [Noun] }ga + [I-/Na- Adjective] desu.

We have been learning how to apply a “verb clause to modify a noun” to several types of sentences. Today’s sentence type is “Wa-ga construction” with adjective predicates. Though the same caution repeats every time when “Wa-ga construction” appears, a wa-ga construction and a transitive verb predicate sentence should not be confused.

– Wa-ga construction; [Topic] wa [Subject] ga [Predicate].

Example1; Ke’eki wa Kodomotachi ga Tabemashita. (When it comes to that cake, kids have eaten it.)

– Transitive verb predicate sentence; [Subject] wa/ga [Object] o [Transitive verb].

Example2; Kodomotachi wa Ke’eki o Tabemashita. (Kids ate the cake.)

More simply, the particle “ga” is for a subject, the particle “o” is for an Object. This is very the basic of Japanese language.

Actually, the Example1 is a minor type of wa-ga construction. For sake of simplicity, think there are two types of wa-ga constructions;

(1) Double subject and stative predicate

(2) The object turned to be the topic (-wa) and the predicate is a transitive verb.

Learning wa-ga construction of type (2) would end up confusion about the difference between wa-ga construction and transitive verb predicate sentence (hence confusion about the difference between particles “ga” and “o”). So, let us concentrate on the wa-ga construction of type (1). Type (1) has a stative predicate. At A5 in section22 (today), the predicates are I-adjective and Na-adjective, and at A6 (tomorrow), the predicate is the intransitive verb to describe existence, “Aru/Arimasu”.

Anyway, the purpose of this post is not to explain about wa-ga construction, but to show how “verb clause to modify a noun” can fit in the “-ga” word of a wa-ga construction.

Some of I-adjectives and Na-adjectives tend to be predicates of wa-ga construction. Let us pick up “Sukina” as example of Na-adjective, and “Hoshii” as example of I-adjective.

1. Watashi wa Hito ga Suki desu. (I like a human kind.)

Perhaps there is a person who likes any people. But it must be rare. Feeling information that the sentence1 gave you is not enough, you would like to ask what kind of human kind this person like. To say “what kind of human kind”, some modification needs to be placed in front of “Hito (a human kind)”. If the modification is a verb clause, it might be like below;

1’. Watashi wa Okane o Takusan Motte iru Hito ga Suki desu. (I like those who have a lot of money.)

In 1’, “Okane o Takusan Motte iru” is the verb clause modifying the noun “Hito”.

2. Watashi wa Reizouko ga Hoshii desu. (I want a refrigerator.)

There is no grammatical error in sentence 2. But if you said like this in a home appliances store, people there would ask you what kind of refrigerator you need. To say what kind of refrigerator you want, you put a modification in front of the noun “Reizouko (refrigerator)”. If the modification is a verb clause, the sentence 2 would change like below;

2’. Watashi wa Reitouko ga Aru Reizouko ga Hoshii desu. (I want a refrigerator that has the freezer.)

In 2’, “Reitouko ga Aru” is the verb clause modifying the noun “Reizouko”.

Usually, 1-door refrigerator doesn’t have the freezer. Opening the lid, you will see a small space that can make ice in the 1-door refrigerator. So, if you say that you want a refrigerator with freezer, it means you need to buy a 2-door refrigerator.

As was explained in A3 S22, not the particle “-wa” but “-ga” is used for the subject inside a verb clause that modifies a noun. Such “-ga” is often converted to “no” like the following;

2’’. Watashi wa Reitouko no Aru Reizouko ga Hoshii desu. (I want a refrigerator that has the freezer.)

This phenomenon is called “Ga-No Conversion”.

This post was written with reference to the exercise A5 on Section22 of “Minna no Nihongo (2nd Edition)” published by “3A Corporation”

Japanese learning (A4 S22): Application of “Verb Modified Noun” to an Object of Transitive Verb Sentence: [Subject] wa [Verb Clause] + [Noun] o [Transitive Verb] masu/mashita.

We have already learned how to apply “Verb modified noun” to a Subject and a Predicate. Now we are going to learn how to apply it to an Object. In order to do it, let’s  review the construction of transitive verb predicate sentences;

1. [Subject] wa [Object] o [Transitive Verb] masu.

Of course, sometimes “[Subject] ga” happens, but it’s not our focus now. When we apply “Verb modified noun” to an object, “1.” turns to be like follows;

2. [Subject] wa { [Verb Clause] + [Noun] } o [Transitive Verb] masu.

Look at the following transitive verb sentence;

3: Watashi wa Ko’ohi’i o Nomimasu. (I drink (a cup of) coffee.)

The sentence 3 is okay, but if you want to add some information to the word “Ko’ohi’i (coffee)”, a verb clause could be placed in front of the noun “Ko’ohi’i” as below;

4: Watashi wa Satou o Ireta Ko’ohi’i o Nomimasu. (I drink coffee in which someone poured sugar.)

5: Watashi wa Satou ga Haitte iru Ko’ohi’i o Nomimasu. (I drink coffee which sugar is in.)

Although English translations in parenthesis may seem strange, let us examine the sentences and their verb clauses of 4 and 5’’.

– Sentences’ predicates are “Nomimasu”, which is in present tense for both 4 and 5.

– Verb clauses modifying “Ko’ohi’i”

4; [Satou o Ireta] — “Ireta” is in past/perfect tense.

5; [Satou ga Haitte iru] — “Haitte iru” is in present tense.

You can see that tenses don’t agree between the predicate “Nomimasu” and the verb in noun modifying clause “Ireta” in the sentence 4. As for the sentence 5, tenses do agree between “Nomimasu” and “Haitte iru”, which are both in present tense. The conclusion is that tenses of the predicate and verb in the modifying clause do not always agree. Or even you need to decide the tenses of the two in accordance with reality.

(“Tense of” is omitted in the titles of following <1> through <4>.)

<1> Sentence Predicate is present/future, Verb clause is also present/future

Example: Watashi wa Korekara, Tomodachi ni Ageru Ke’eki o Kai ni Ikimasu.

(Now I am going to buy a sweet cake that I will give to my friend.)

<2> Sentence Predicate is present/future, but Verb clause is past/perfect

Example: Watashi wa Korekara, Tomodachi ni Moratta Ke’eki o Tabemasu.

(Now I am going to eat a sweet cake that my friend gave to me.)

<3> Sentence Predicate is past/perfect, but Verb clause is present/future

Example: Watashi wa Sakki, Tomodachi ni Ageru Ke’eki o Katte Kimashita.

(I just came back from buying a sweet cake that I would give to my friend.)

<4> Sentence Predicate is past/perfect, Verb clause is also past/perfect

Example: Watashi wa Sakki, Tomodachi ni Moratta Ke’eki o Tabemashita.

(I have just eaten a sweet cake that my friend had given to me.)

Things are different between action has been done or not yet done. Therefore, when using a verb, you always need to pay attention to tense. If you want to apply a “noun modifying verb clause”, it is necessary to decide the both tenses of predicate verb and verb in modifying clause taking consideration of sequence of these actions.

This post was written with reference to the exercise A4 on Section22 of “Minna no Nihongo (2nd Edition)” published by “3A Corporation”

Japanese learning (A3 S22): Application of “Verb Modified Noun” to a Subject of Sentence: [Verb Clause] + [Noun] wa [Predicate].

Yesterday we learned the sentence construction in which “verb modified noun” is used in the predicate of “Noun predicate sentence” as below;

 [Subject] wa [Predicate] desu.

=> [Subject] wa { [Verb Clause] + [Noun] } desu.

Example: Kore wa Ichnen-sei ga Tsukau Kyoukasho desu. (This is a textbook that the first-grade students use.)

When a “Verb modified noun” is used in the predicate, the sentence must be a “noun predicate sentence (it may sound like a tautology, but)”. On the other, when a “Verb modified noun” is used in the subject, the predicate is not limited to be a noun. So, we are going to learn today the sentence construction whose subject is “verb modified noun”, while the predicate is either of noun, Na-adjective, I-adjective, and verb.

[Subject] wa [Predicate].

=> { [Verb Clause] + [Noun] } wa [Noun] desu.

=> { [Verb Clause] + [Noun] } wa [Na-adjective] desu.

=> { [Verb Clause] + [Noun] } wa [I-adjective] desu.

=> { [Verb Clause] + [Noun] } wa [Verb] masu.

<1> Predicate is Noun

Example: Haha ga yoku Iku Su’upa’a wa ABC Ma’ato desu.

(The supermarket that my mother goes often is ABC Mart.)

<2> Predicate is Na-adjective

Example: Watashitachi ga Toukyou de Itsumo Tomaru Hoteru wa Kirei desu.

(The hotel that we always stay at in Tokyo is clean.)

! “Kireina” is not an I-adjective but a Na-adjective.

<3> Predicate is I-adjective

Example: Satou-san ga Tsukatte iru No’oto Pasokon wa Karui desu.

(The personal computer that Sato-san is using is light.)

<4> Predicate is Verb

Example: Watashi ga Iku Tokoya wa Eki no Chikaku ni Arimasu.

(The barber I go to is near the train station.)

<IMPORTANT> the Subject marker is “ga” for a verb clause modifying a noun

Look at whether “ga” or “wa” is used for indicating the subject inside verb clause that is modifying a noun. The followings are the same as <1> through <4> above.

– { [Haha <ga> yoku Iku] + [Su’upa’a] } wa ABC Ma’ato desu.

– { [Watashitachi <ga> Toukyou de Itsumo Tomaru] + [Hoteru] } wa Kirei desu.

– { [Satou-san <ga> Tsukatte iru] + [No’oto Pasokon] } wa Karui desu.

– { [Watashi <ga> Iku] + [Tokoya] } wa Eki no Chikaku ni Arimasu.

You can see that “ga” is used for the subject inside verb clause that is modifying a noun.

When choosing “wa” or “ga” as the subject marker, the following criteria works;

– When to say condition or action about a known subject, “wa” is used.

– When the purpose of sentence is to say what the subject is, “ga” is used.

Then, why “ga” is used for the subject inside verb clause modifying a noun? The verb clause modifying a noun strongly specifies what kind of a noun that is. Therefore, the verb clause needs to clearly indicate who performs what action on the noun. Usually, the subject inside verb clause is not known to the listener, is what the speaker needs to specify. This is the reason why “ga” is used for the subject inside the verb clause that modifies a noun.

This post was written with reference to the exercise A3 on Section22 of “Minna no Nihongo (2nd Edition)” published by “3A Corporation”

Japanese learning (A2 S22): Application of Verb Modified Noun to a Predicate of Noun Predicate Sentence: [Subject] wa [Verb Clause] + [Noun] desu.

We have learned how to modify a noun with verb clause at exercise A1 in Section 22. But examples shown there were not sentence, but phrases. How can we use those phrases in a sentence? To begin with, let us think about where a noun is used in sentences.

– Noun predicate sentence: [Subject] wa [Predicate] desu.

=> [Predicate] is a noun => Exercise A2 : [Predicate] = verb-modified-noun

=> [Subject] is a noun => Exercise A3 : [Subject] = verb-modified-noun

– Transitive verb sentence: [Subject] wa [Object] o [Transitive Verb] masu.

=> [Object] is a noun => Exercise A4 : [Object] = verb-modified-noun

– Wa-ga construction : [Topic] wa [Subject] ga [Predicate]

=> [Subject] is a noun => Exercise A5 and A6 : [Subject] = verb-modified-noun

   — Predicates are adjectives in A5, and intransitive verb for existence “Aru/Arimasu” in A6.

Today we are going to learn A2 which uses “verb-modified-noun” for a predicate in noun predicate sentence.

1. [Subject] wa {[Verb clause] + [Noun]} desu.

And a quick review of “verb clause” to modify a noun is that the ending of the verb clause needs to be “concise ending”.

Take a look at the following noun predicate sentence.

2. Kore wa Kyoukasho desu. (This is a textbook.)

The sentence 2 is a correct one. But you may feel this sentence doesn’t have good information. Then let’s apply a verb modification to the predicate “Kyoukasho”.

2’. Kore wa Ichnen-sei ga Tsukau Kyoukasho desu. (This is a textbook that the first-grade students use.)

3. Satou-san wa Hito desu. (Sato-san is a person.)

This is apparently a sentence whose information is not enough.

3’. Satou-san wa Uwagi o Kite iru Hito desu. (Sato-san is the one who is wearing a Jacket.)

4. Koko wa Basho desu. (This is a place.)

This, too, lacks information. Let’s put a modification with a verb in front of the noun “Basho”.

4’. Koko wa Takushii ni Noru Basho desu. (Here is the place we get on a taxi.)

This post was written with reference to the exercise A2 on Section22 of “Minna no Nihongo (2nd Edition)” published by “3A Corporation”

Japanese learning (A1 S22): Modifying a Noun by a Verb Clause: [Concise Ending of Verb Clause] + [Noun]

At first, let us review ways to modify a noun. Putting aside adverbs and adverbials to modify a verb, we are just focusing on modification for a noun. The basic thing is that a modifying word is placed in front of a modified word as below;

[Modifying Word] + [Modified Word]

1. I-adjective modifies a noun

– [ Stem of I-adj ] + I + [ Noun ]

example: Aoi Sora (bule sky), Sabishii Kimochi (sad feeling)

2. Na-adjective modifies a noun

– [ Stem of Na-adj ] + na + [ Noun ]

example: Kireina Hana (beautiful flower), Shizukana Toshokan (quiet library)

3. Noun modifies another Noun

– [ Noun1 ] + no + [Noun2]

example: Nihon no Kuruma (Japanese cars), Watashi no Neko (my cat)

Then, is there a way to modify a noun with a verb? It is what we are learning today.

Recently we have learned “concise endings” in the section 20. They are a kind of writing style*, because they are used for sentence endings in a writing such as newspaper, technical report, and contract document.  But the same patterns of verb predicates can also be used for a middle of a sentence, that is to be placed in front of a noun, in order to modify the noun.

The followings are examples of noun-modification with verb clause;

<1> Modified Noun is the object (-o) of a verb

– Present/future-positive:

Example: Kodomo ga Taberu Okashi (snack that kids eat)

The verb “Taberu” is in dictionary form, modifying the noun “Okashi”. “Okashi” is a noun usually being an object of the transitive verb “Taberu/Tabemasu” as “Okashi o Tabemasu”

– Present/future-negative:

Example: Kodomo ga Tabenai Okashi (snack that kids don’t eat)

– Past-positive:

Example: Kinou Tabeta Okashi (snack that I ate yesterday)

– Past-negative:

Example: Kinou Tabenakatta Okashi (snack that I didn’t eat yesterday)

<2> Modified Noun is the subject (-ga) of a verb

– Present/future-positive:

Example: Shukudai o Suru Gakusei (a student who does homework)

The verb “Suru” is in dictionary form, modifying the noun “Gakusei”. “Gakusei” is a noun usually being a subject of the verb “Suru/Shimasu” as “Gakusei ga Shukudai o Shimasu.”

– Present/future-negative:

Example: Shukudai o Shinai Gakusei (a student who doesn’t do homework)

– Past-positive:

Example: Shukudai o Shita Gakusei (a student who did homework)

– Past-negative:

Example: Shukudai o Shinakatta Gakusei (a student who didn’t do homework)

<3> Application of “V-te Iru” to Modification of a Noun

– Present-positive:

Example: Ima Aruite iru Michi (a path that I am walking on now)

“Atuite” is the Te-form of “Aruku/Arukimasu”.

– Present-negative:

Example: Dare mo Aruite inai Michi (a path that no one is walking on.)

– Past-positive:

Example: Tomodachi ga Aruite ita Michi (a path that my friend was walking on.)

– Past-negative:

Example: Dare mo Aruite inakatta Michi (a path that no one was walking on.)

*: Concise ending can also be speech style by putting ending particle like “-yo.”, “-ne”, and “-yone.” I omit mentioning this just for sake of simplicity.

This post was written with reference to the exercise A1 on Section22 of “Minna no Nihongo (2nd Edition)” published by “3A Corporation”

Japanese learning (A4 S21): Expression in Conversation to Make a Confirmation: [Clause]+deshou?

Today’s expression is to be used in relatively casual conversation. I don’t think it is good to use it when you talk to older people, your boss, your teacher, your customer, and so on. If your listener is people of the same social status, then it’s okay to use.

Today’s expression can be classified by a predicate inside [Clause] as below;

 [Clause] + deshou?

1. Predicate in [Clause] is a Verb

Both for <present/past tense> and <past tense>

[Concise ending of verb predicate] + deshou?

– Ashita Ohanami ni Iku deshou? (You are going to Under-cherry-blossom-party tomorrow, aren’t you?)

! The verb “Iku” is in present/future tense, and also the form of concise ending.

– Kinou Hakubutsukan de Konsa’ato ga Atta deshou? (I think a concert was held in the museum yesterday. Right?)

! The verb “Atta” is in past tense, and also the form of concise ending.

2. Predicate in [Clause] is an I-adjective

Both for <present/past tense> and <past tense>

[Concise ending of I-adjective predicate] + deshou?

– Nihon wa Sakana no Ryouri ga Oishii deshou? (Seafood is very good in Japan, isn’t it?)

! The I-adjective “Oishii” is in present tense, and also the form of concise ending.

– Kinou no Pa’a ti’i wa Tanoshikatta deshou? (Yesterday’s party was fun, wasn’t it?)

! The I-adjective “Tanoshikatta” is in past tense, and also the form of concise ending.

3. Predicate in [Clause] is a Na-adjective

For <present tense>

[Stem of Na-adjective] + deshou?

– Kono Heya wa Ju’ubun Kirei deshou? (Don’t you think this room is clean enough?)

! “Kirei” is not an I-adjective, but a Na-adjective. Concise ending is “Kireida.” But “Kireida deshou?” is wrong. It should be “Kirei deshou?”

For <past tense>

[Concise ending of Na-adjective predicate]

– Kinou Machi wa Shizuka datta deshou? (The town was quiet yesterday, wasn’t it?)

! The Na-adjective “Shizukadatta” is in past tense, and also the form of concise ending.

4. Predicate in [Clause] is a Noun

For <present tense>

[Noun] + deshou?

– Satou-san wa Daigakusei deshou? (Sato-san is a university student, isn’t she?)

! Although the concise ending for Noun Predicate is like “Daigakusei da”, “Daigakusei da deshou?” is wrong. It should be “Daigakusei deshou?”

For <past tense>

[Concise ending of Noun predicate]

– Kinou wa Yasumi datta deshou? (Yesterday was a day-off, wasn’t it?)

! “Yasumi datta” is in past tense, and also the form of concise ending.

Today’s “deshou” has a function to make a confirmation. But “deshou” has another function, that is express your speculation. “deshou” for speculation will be introduced in the section 32. As to distinction of the two, think like follows; “deshou” with ascending intonation is to make a confirmation. “deshou” with descending intonation is speculation.

– Kinou wa Ame datta deshou? (↑)　— Confirmation

– Ashita wa Ame deshou. (↓) — Speculation

This post was written with reference to the exercise A4 on Section21 of “Minna no Nihongo (2nd Edition)” published by “3A Corporation”

Japanese learning (A3 S21): Nested Complex Sentence like “I said that Subject+Predicate”: Watashi wa [Person] ni ([Subject]+[Predicate]) to Iimashita.

Today’s construction also uses the particle “to” that indicates the end of what to speak or what to think. And the predicate is a verb of speaking and thinking.

1. Watashi wa [what to speak/think] to [verb of speaking and thinking].

In the last two posts for A1 and A2 of the section 21, the predicate verb was “Omoimasu(think)”. Today’s verb is “Iu/Iimasu(say/speak/tell)”. Usually the verb “Iu/Iimasu” needs “to whom you are speaking to” as information. Therefore, a sentence using the verb “Iimasu” uses the word with particle “ni” as shown below.

2. Watashi wa Sensei ni Sakkaabu o Yameru to Iimashita. (I told my teacher that I was quitting the soccer club.)

Note that the predicate verb in the above sentence is in past tense “Iimashita”. If it’s in non-past tense “Iimasu”, it would mean “I am going to tell in near future”. Let us just use the past tense “Iimashita” in order to mention what has already happened rather than to say uncertain things in future.

The following examples have variation for the nested predicate. The sentence predicate is “Iimashita”.

3. V-dic: Yasumu

Watashi wa Kachou ni Ashita Yasumu to Iimashita. (I told my company manager that I was going to have day-off tomorrow.)

4. V-nai: Inai

Watashi wa Tomodachi ni Mada Ohirugohan o Tabete Inai to Iimashita. (I told my friend that I hadn’t eaten the lunch yet.)

– For the above sentence, “Tabenai to Iimashita” is wrong not only because it is inconsistent with the adverb “Mada (not yet)”, but also it means “I am not going to eat”. The current situation is “Not eating”, and “Not eating” is continuing some period of time until now. Therefore, you need to use “V-te iru”.

5. V-ta: Shita

Watashi wa Sensei ni Mou Shukudai wo Shita to Iimashita. (I told my teacher that I had already done the homework.)

6. I-adj: Hoshii

Watasi wa Haha ni Okane ga Hoshii to Iimashita. (I told my mother that I wanted money.)

– Don’t say “Okaasan” when you talk to people other than family members.

7. Na-adj: Kireida

Watashi wa Kanojo ni Kimi wa Kireida to Iimashita. (I told my girlfriend that she was beautiful.)

– Kimi is a noun that means you (not she) with a rude nuance.

– “Kirei” is not an I-adjective, but a Na-adjective!!

This post was written with reference to the exercise A3 on Section21 of “Minna no Nihongo (2nd Edition)” published by “3A Corporation”

Japanese learning (A2 S21): Expressing your Opinion uses the Same Construction as saying your Speculation; Watashi wa ([Subject]+[Predicate]) to Omoimasu.

We have recently learned the following construction;

1. Watashi wa Mousugu Ame ga Furu to Omoimasu. (I think it’s going to rain soon.)

Since the verb “Omou/Omoimasu” is usually translated to “think”, the above sentence 1 seems to express what you are thinking. But to be more exact, this sentence has a function to say your speculation. Actually, today’s sentence construction is identical to the sentence 1.

2. Watashi wa Risaikuru wa Chikyuu o Mamoru to Omoimasu. (I think Recycling saves our planet.)

Although the example 2 also sounds like a speculation, you can regard 2 as an opinion of the speaker. Let us look at some examples that are expressing opinions using “to Omoimasu”.

3. [V-dic] + to Omoimasu.

Watashi wa Kasa wa Kyou Yaku ni Tatsu to Omoimasu. (I think an umbrella will be useful today.)

– Yaku ni Tatsu: Gr1-T verb; can be useful

4. [V-nakereba naranai] + to Omoimasu.

Watashi wa Kodomo wa Tetsudai o Shinakereba naranai to Omoimasu. (I think kids should help with household chores)

– Nakereba naranai/Nakereba narimasen => Refer to A3 S17

5. [I-adj] + to Omoimasu.

Watashi wa Nihongo wa Muzukashii to Omoimasu. (I think Japanese is difficult.)

6. [Na-adj] + to Omoimasu.

Watashi wa Kuruma wa Benrida to Omoimasu. (I think a car is useful.)

7. [Noun] da + to Omoimasu.

Watashi wa Satou-san no Hanashi wa Hontou da to Omoimasu. (I think what we are talking about Sato-san is real.)

Now we have learned that “to Omoimasu.” can express two things; Speculation and Opinion. They are shown in A1 and A2, respectively. However, I think “to Omoimasu” has a common function to both A1 and A2. That is to avoid making definitive statements. Using “to Omoimasu”, you can make your speculation or opinion more moderate. For example, no one can say we are going to have rain tomorrow for 100 percent sure. Rather than to say “Ashita Ame ga Furimasu”, it is better to say “Ashita Ame ga Furu to Omoimasu”. Another example is; you think recycling is good for our earth, but someone may think recycling doesn’t facilitate new production. If you say “Risaikuru wa Chikyuu o Mamorimasu”, such people may yell at you. If you say “Risaikuru wa Chikyuu o Mamoru to Omoimasu”, your opinion would sound more moderate.

This post was written with reference to the exercise A2 on Section21 of “Minna no Nihongo (2nd Edition)” published by “3A Corporation”

Japanese learning (A1 S21): Nested Complex Sentences like “I think that Subject+Predicate”: Watashi wa ([Subject]+[Predicate]) to Omoimasu.

Recently we learned the concise endings of sentences that were introduced in the section 20 of Minnano Nihongo. The followings are review about use of concise endings;

<1> Concise ending is used for casual conversation with your friends and family members often with some final particles describing friendliness (-yo, -ne, -yone, and so on) at the end.

<2> Concise ending is used for formal writings such as newspapers, technical reports, contract documents, and so on. The important difference from <1> is that final particles describing friendliness are not used.

<3> CE is used when studying Japanese grammar because of its conciseness to save your time and spaces on notebook.

<4> CE is used when you talk to yourself and write a diary.

<1> through <4> about concise ending are all about sentences’ endings. But not only for sentence endings, but concise endings are also used in the middle of a sentence. It is a kind of nested complex sentences using verbs of speaking and thinking. Today, we are going to learn such sentences with a verb of thinking, “Omou/Omoimasu (think)”. As a preparation, look at the following English sentence.

– I think that it’s going to rain soon.

= [Subject]+[Perceptual Verb]+that+[Subject]+[Predicate]

As you know, “that” in the above sentence can be omitted, probably because of the linearity of language (Though I am not good at English grammar). When you say “think”, people can expect what is coming next. It is a nested [Subject]+[Predicate] structure, even if “that” is omitted. Then what about Japanese?

– Watashi wa Mousugu Ame ga Furu to Omoimasu. (I think that it’s going to rain soon.)

In the case of Japanese, a nested [Subject]+[Predicate] structure is placed before the Verb. In terms of the linearity of language, you need to know where the end of the nested [Subject]+[Predicate] structure is. The end is marked by “to”. This “to” cannot be omitted.

The examples shown below are classified with type of “nested” predicates

<Verb; present-positive> — furu

– Watashi wa Mousugu Ame ga Furu to Omoimasu. (I think it’s going to rain soon.)

<Verb; present-negative> — furanai

– Watashi wa Ame wa* Furanai to Omoimasu. (I don’t think it’s going to rain.)

<Verb; past-positive> — futta

– (Watashi wa) Kinou Ame ga futta to Omoimasu. (I think it rained yesterday.)

<Verb; past-negative> — furanakatta

– (Watashiha wa) Kinou Ame wa Furanakatta to Omoimasu. (I don’t think it rained yesterday.)

<I-adj; present-positive > — Atsui

– Watashi wa Ashita Atusi to Omoimasu. (I think it’s going to be hot tomorrow.)

<I-adj; present-negative > — Atsukunai

– Watashi wa Ashita Son’nani Atsukunai to Omoimasu. (I don’t think it’s going to be that hot tomorrow.)

<I-adj; past-positive > — Atsukatta

– (Watashi wa ) Kinou wa Atsukatta to Omoimasu. (I think it was hot yesterday.)

<I-adj; > — Atskunakatta

– (Watashi wa ) Kinou wa Son’nani Atsukunakatta to Omoimasu. (I don’t think it was that hot yesterday.)

<Na-adj; present-positive > — Kireida

– Watashi wa Sono Heya wa Kireida to Omoimasu. (I think that room is clean.)

<Na-adj; present-negative > — Kireidewanai (Kireijanai)

– Watashi wa Sono Heya wa Kireidewanai to Omoimasu. (I don’t think that room is clean.)

<Na-adj; past-positive > — Kireidatta

– (Watashi wa ) Sono Heya wa Kireidatta to Omoimasu. (I think that room was clean.)

<Na-adj; past-negative > — Kireidewanakatta (Kireijanakatta)

– (Watashi wa ) Sono Heya wa Kireidewanakatta to Omoimasu. (I don’t think that room was clean.)

* What we are learning here is NOT “wa-ga construction”. In the construction below;

[Subject1] {[Subject2]+[Predicate2]} to Omoimasu.

Subject markers “wa” or “ga” is selected independently for each of Subject1 and Subject2.

This post was written with reference to the exercise A1 on Section21 of “Minna no Nihongo (2nd Edition)” published by “3A Corporation”